From: "Andrei Berceanu berceanu@runbox.com" Received: from mx1.fz-rossendorf.de ([149.220.142.11] verified) by hzdr.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.7i) with ESMTP id 18878338 for picongpu-users@cg.hzdr.de; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:52:31 +0200 Received: from a1911.mx.srv.dfn.de (a1911.mx.srv.dfn.de [194.95.232.137]) by mx1.fz-rossendorf.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2625A3427A for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:53:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mgw2-han.srv.dfn.de Authentication-Results: mgw2-han.srv.dfn.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=runbox.com Received: from aibo.runbox.com (aibo.runbox.com [91.220.196.211]) by a1911.mx.srv.dfn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BEB7E00AB for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:53:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=runbox.com; s=rbselector1; h=Content-Type:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To: MIME-Version; bh=3u/klCYuhhLlKXlBVek+Pd7LIqDA9p5tcgF2jiabhZw=; b=PqqK9zU3aQlx Ede9ZRRd2OPYlW9/z/rFTQMQDxe5FjHydh7zA3z8vpQ4/h0P0vvUrGWiIrQVuBpMLmefLKj+VEpQH Ei7lGUQ3Zi07ilCKSEjddGwxDR9fZGW3CZhcMw/flznQpJEunONCJjYJHsU2dpb4sobG7EauSIcUb ZY9m4ilnAm/ZnGjXkbXC1NurwMYisCaLzFsCTcL1r83FG8HgUAfQThoFBCqlKkYlW0JC/rvgh8bfO 1Yp3gD5bXMdQpU64yF5W9AQUv6VqfHzR7X0/LQwcPiEZGEXH4VtACXQ0Hywqev/EIXOJsVs9vHsu4 pCTS9pCGwNwNp56D+9E4jw==; Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fveEz-00056v-IO for picongpu-users@hzdr.de; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:53:13 +0200 Received: by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:811097 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) id 1fveEm-0002Kx-2Z for picongpu-users@hzdr.de; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:53:00 +0200 Received: by mail-qt0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t5-v6so13623545qtn.3 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:53:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CAMWpBU2cVG5xPKd7J7AMQPcS//FxkewRfm6VgeU1m8ZE71RnC oyA2fd58VaNHSiRNIthVCii87yFBeYL0NmcSRyc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdb22Z4ZyFvXSPCL/dsALGiTgmtR2fStPU/lBOhMhVi3QsEHfBoo5cnFl0MOZ3ziQRRk4zo7ss62fs+fVtXNZTo= X-Received: by 2002:aed:2f83:: with SMTP id m3-v6mr14775024qtd.96.1535701979046; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:52:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: berceanu@runbox.com Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:52:48 +0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: PIConGPU performance across different GPUs To: picongpu-users@hzdr.de Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f127a30574b67ae6" --000000000000f127a30574b67ae6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dear all, In you experience, how does PIConGPU performance vary across different Tesla cards, such as the K80, P100 and V100? Is it fair to say, for instance, that one P100 is equivalent to two K80s? Best regards, Andrei --000000000000f127a30574b67ae6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear all,

In you experience, how does P= IConGPU performance vary across different Tesla cards, such as the K80, P10= 0 and V100?

Is it fair to say, for instance, that = one P100 is equivalent to two K80s?

Best regards,<= /div>
Andrei
--000000000000f127a30574b67ae6--